Supreme Court judgment on Orji Uzor Kalu’s case is a license to plunder – Lawyer 

A legal practitioner and political adviser, Charles Adeyinka has described the nullification of the trial and conviction of former Governor Orji Uzor Kalu, as a licence to plunder for public officers in the country.

Adeyinka, in a statement made available to Ripples Nigeria on Sunday, noted that the enactment of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), upon which the former President of the Court of Appeal relied on to grant fiat to Justice Mohammed Idris of the court to return to his former court of the Federal High Court Lagos to complete Kalu’s trial, was meant to not just speed up trial but also to ensure that justice is done for the good of the nation.

The lawyer also argued that a diligent research of the two of the cases, amongst others the Supreme Court relied upon to arrived at its judgement, Ogbuanyinya V. Okudo, and Bichi V. Shakarau, were decided before the enactment of the ACJA.

The statement reads: “On May 7 2020, most Nigerians woke up with the shocking news that former Governor Orji Uzo Kalu, who was serving a 12 Year jail term for theft of 7.1 Billion Naira, just had his conviction nullified by the Supreme Court, and his case remanded back to the High Court for re-trial.

“In ruling in Kalu’s favour, the Supreme Court nullified Section 396 (7) of the “Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015; a legislation that was passed to speed up existing trials, by allowing the original sitting High Court Judge, to return and finish cases they were sitting on, before their elevation to a higher court. Justice Mohammed Idris the judge in this case had being elevated to the Court of Appeal.

Read also: Kwara govt confirms 1st covid-19 death, confirms 4 new cases of the virus

“The curious twist in this matter is that in arriving at its result, the Supreme Court relied on prior cases which included, “Ogbuanyinya V. Okudo, and Bichi V. Shakarau among their authorities. However, a thorough and diligent case-law research in this matter, should have unearthed that the above cases were decided before the ACJA was deemed necessary, and passed legislatively as a judicial tool, to speed up hearings and arrive at a closure, and ensure that Justice is served, for the good of the nation.

“By ruling to remand this matter back to court for a new trial, after 12 years of diligent litigation, 19 Witnesses, and millions in legal fees by the EFCC, coupled with EFCC haven proven its substantive case beyond reasonable doubt on the merits, is to reverse the efforts of all Nigerians to tackle corruption effectively.

“The Supreme Court is charged with interpreting laws, not to thwart the society’s forward march toward accountability in public office. The Supreme Courts failure to be diligent in the interest of Nigeria, and Nigerians, begs the question of whether the Justices have been compromised by Kalu.

“Judicial economy dictates that litigation expenses and unnecessary complexities should be curtailed as part of the administration of justice; and sanctions are always designed to fit the crime. Sending this case back to the High Court for a new trial, smirks of insensitivity to the nation’s march toward a corruption-free nation, and a bona fide “License to Plunder”, for all the nation’s public officials.

“If the Courts will let public officials loose, through minor technicalities, whether they were guilty on the substantive charges or not, then Nigeria has entered a new era, and a “License to Plunder” has just been issued for the nations Officials.”

Opinions